|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssessment
|
| 47.0 pts
Excellent
Writes a cogent and sophisticated assessment of the client’s mental health status, policy analysis, or program proposal and the need it addresses
|
35.0 pts
Satisfactory
Writes a brief assessment of the client’s mental health status, policy analysis, or program proposal and the need it addresses
|
30.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Writes a brief assessment of the client’s mental health status, policy analysis, or program proposal and the need it addresses, but assessment lacks detail or contains inaccuracies
|
0.0 pts
Not Evident
Does not write a brief assessment of the client’s mental health status, policy analysis, or program proposal
|
|
47.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContext and Background
|
| 47.0 pts
Excellent
Provides a sophisticated explanation of the context of the treatment, policy, or program as it relates to the disaster management cycle, including relevant historical background
|
35.0 pts
Satisfactory
Describes the context of the treatment, policy, or program as it relates to the disaster management cycle, including relevant historical background
|
30.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Describes the context of the treatment, policy, or program as it relates to the disaster management cycle, including relevant historical background, but description lacks detail or contains inaccuracies
|
0.0 pts
Not Evident
Does not describe the context of the treatment, policy, or program
|
|
47.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRationale
|
| 47.0 pts
Excellent
Provides sophisticated rationale for the treatment, policy, or program. Provides a sophisticated explanation of how the intervention, policy, or program supports the goals of the individual community. Provides in-depth explanation of the main components of the intervention, policy, or treatment and how they address the disaster cycle. Tools or resources used are appropriate in supporting the intervention, policy, or program.
|
35.0 pts
Satisfactory
Provides rationale for the treatment, policy, or program.; Provides an explanation of how the intervention, policy, or program supports the goals of the individual community. Describes the main components of the intervention, policy, or treatment and how they address the disaster cycle. Specify tools or resources used.
|
30.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Provides rationale for the treatment, policy, or program, but rationale does not address the disaster cycle, lacks detail, or contains inaccuracies
|
0.0 pts
Not Evident
Does not provide rationale for the treatment, policy, or program
|
|
47.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEffectiveness
|
| 47.0 pts
Excellent
Provides an insightful explanation for how the treatment, policy or program demonstrates its effectivenes
|
35.0 pts
Satisfactory
Explains how the treatment, policy or program demonstrates its effectiveness
|
30.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Explains how the treatment, policy or program demonstrates its effectiveness, but explanation lacks detail or contains inaccuracies
|
0.0 pts
Not Evident
Does not explain how the treatment, policy, or program demonstrates its effectiveness
|
|
47.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiversity
|
| 47.0 pts
Excellent
Provides an insightful and thoughtful explanation for how the treatment, policy, or program addresses or fails to address issues of diversity
|
35.0 pts
Satisfactory
Explains how the treatment, policy, or program addresses or fails to address issues of diversity
|
30.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Explains how the treatment, policy, or program addresses or fails to address issues of diversity, but explanation lacks detail or contains inaccuracies
|
0.0 pts
Not Evident
Does not explain how the treatment, policy, or program addresses or fails to address issues of diversity
|
|
47.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeChallenges
|
| 47.0 pts
Excellent
Offers a sophisticated explanation of any issues and challenges faced in implementation
|
35.0 pts
Satisfactory
Details any issues and challenges in implementation
|
30.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Details any issues and challenges in implementation, but description is incomplete or contains inaccuracies
|
0.0 pts
Not Evident
Does not detail any issues and challenges in implementation
|
|
47.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation
|
| 47.0 pts
Excellent
Provides a cogent explanation of the plan for evaluating the treatment, policy, or program, and how it may be improved
|
35.0 pts
Satisfactory
Describes the plan for evaluating the treatment, policy, or program, and how it may be improved
|
30.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Describes the plan for evaluating the treatment, policy, or program, but description lacks detail or contains inaccuracies
|
0.0 pts
Not Evident
Does not describe the plan for evaluating the treatment, policy, or program
|
|
47.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
|
| 21.0 pts
Excellent
References appropriate scholarly work to provide justification for treatment plan. Assignment is free of grammatical errors and all references are cited in APA format.
|
15.0 pts
Satisfactory
References appropriate scholarly work to provide justification for treatment plan. Assignment is free of grammatical errors and all references are cited in APA format.
|
10.0 pts
Needs Improvement
References appropriate scholarly work to provide justification for treatment plan. Minor grammatical errors. Some references are not cited in APA format.
|
0.0 pts
Not Evident
Does not reference scholarly work to provide justification for treatment plan. Major grammatical errors.
|
|
21.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 350.0
|